docs(seed): add anti-AI-voice + humor-craft standard to question guides
The content agent (ChatGPT) authors packs from these guides, and the repo has documented LLM over-compliance failures: snack overload, 416/499 same-mechanic six-question blocks, exactly-6-of-each mechanic counts. The guides banned therapy voice but never the machine-voice failure modes. - QUESTION_CONTENT_GUIDE.md: new section 8A "Write Like a Human" — AI-tell phrase ban, no-exclamation/no-emoji/sentence-case rules, humor craft (joke lives in the detail not the adjective; one absurd detail max; adult-deadpan mock-formality register; punch at the situation never the partner; snort test at ~1-in-4), anti-uniformity guards (guide examples are categories not vocabulary; no template blocks in any 10 consecutive; uneven distribution is correct), texting test. Also retitled section 18 agent-neutral. - DAILY_SINGLE_CHOICE_WEEKDAY_SYSTEM.md (v8→v9): "Daily Voice: Human and Funny" subsection — weekday theme is the angle not a template stem; wildcard absurdity rules; points at 8A as authority. - QUESTION_QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md (v10→v11): machine-voice Automatic Rejects, implausibly-even mechanic-count repetition check, and 5 new marking reasons (ai_voice, labeled_joke, uniform_option_grammar, guide_example_parrot, brand_caption_voice) so patch discipline can target these failures. Additive only: no schema/importer-contract, count, or patch-policy changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d7d97cc8a8
commit
fb9a876b98
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
# Daily Single Choice Weekday System v8 — Importer-Aligned
|
||||
# Daily Single Choice Weekday System v9 — Importer-Aligned, Human-Voice
|
||||
|
||||
This document defines the Closer daily weekday question pack.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -304,6 +304,29 @@ Avoid these in daily questions:
|
|||
|
||||
These words push the pack toward therapy voice.
|
||||
|
||||
## Daily Voice: Human and Funny
|
||||
|
||||
The daily pack is the funniest surface in the app, so the "Write Like a Human" standard in
|
||||
`QUESTION_CONTENT_GUIDE.md` (section 8A) binds hardest here. Read it before writing any daily batch.
|
||||
|
||||
Daily-specific applications:
|
||||
|
||||
* The joke must live in the detail, never in a label. If "silly" or "ridiculous" is doing the humor
|
||||
work, the line has no humor. Cut the adjective and make the option specific enough to be funny alone.
|
||||
* The house register is adult deadpan: mock-formality and fake stakes for tiny real things. Not
|
||||
chaotic-quirky, not children's-entertainer energy.
|
||||
* The weekday theme is the *angle*, not a template stem. Every Thursday prompt opening
|
||||
"What's the funniest..." is a machine fingerprint. Approach each weekday's mood from a different
|
||||
direction every time.
|
||||
* Wildcards get the single most absurd detail in the pack — still adult deadpan, still one absurd
|
||||
detail maximum.
|
||||
* The guides' example nouns ("two-song kitchen dance", "dessert walk", "snack board") are categories,
|
||||
not vocabulary. Shipping them verbatim is a reject.
|
||||
* No exclamation marks in prompts. No emoji in prompts or options. Options in sentence case.
|
||||
* Aim for roughly one question in four to pass the snort test (partner would snort and show the
|
||||
other the phone); the rest land warm and concrete. A pack that strains for a laugh on every line
|
||||
is as exhausting as one with none.
|
||||
|
||||
## Good Daily Examples
|
||||
|
||||
Good:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -564,6 +564,131 @@ What is one small thing that makes you want to be closer to me?
|
|||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 8A. Write Like a Human
|
||||
|
||||
Section 8 bans therapy voice. This section bans the other failure mode: content that is technically
|
||||
warm and playful but reads machine-written. These are the patterns that make a pack feel like an app
|
||||
talking instead of a person.
|
||||
|
||||
## AI-tell phrases are banned
|
||||
|
||||
Never use these in prompts or options:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
spice things up
|
||||
take it to the next level
|
||||
level up
|
||||
unleash
|
||||
embark
|
||||
elevate
|
||||
epic
|
||||
ultimate
|
||||
game-changer
|
||||
adventure awaits
|
||||
cozy up (as a command)
|
||||
delight / delightful
|
||||
whimsical
|
||||
a dash of
|
||||
sprinkle
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
These are marketing-bot words. A real person deciding what to do tonight does not say "let's elevate
|
||||
our evening."
|
||||
|
||||
## Punctuation and case rules
|
||||
|
||||
- No exclamation marks in prompts.
|
||||
- No emoji in prompts or options.
|
||||
- Options use sentence case, never Title Case.
|
||||
|
||||
Enthusiasm comes from the idea, not the punctuation.
|
||||
|
||||
## The joke is the detail, not the adjective
|
||||
|
||||
Never label a joke. "Silly", "hilarious", "ridiculous", and "funny" doing the humor work means there
|
||||
is no humor in the line. Make the option itself funny through unexpected specificity.
|
||||
|
||||
Dead:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
A silly dance together
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Alive:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
A two-song kitchen dance
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The second one is funny because "two-song" is a weirdly specific commitment. Nobody labeled it.
|
||||
|
||||
If removing the word "silly" or "ridiculous" from a line kills it, the line was already dead.
|
||||
|
||||
## One absurd detail, maximum
|
||||
|
||||
One unexpected detail makes a line funny. Two makes it a kids' menu.
|
||||
|
||||
Good: a formal award ceremony for whoever picked the better snack.
|
||||
|
||||
Too much: a formal award ceremony with a trophy made of cheese judged by the cat in a tiny hat.
|
||||
|
||||
## The house humor register
|
||||
|
||||
Closer's humor is adult deadpan: mock-formality and fake stakes applied to tiny real things.
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
official pick
|
||||
formal ruling
|
||||
lifetime achievement award for couch positioning
|
||||
a binding decision
|
||||
this week's championship
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Not random wackiness. Not chaotic-quirky. Not children's-entertainer energy. Two adults keeping a
|
||||
straight face about something small — that is the register.
|
||||
|
||||
## Punch at the situation, never at the partner
|
||||
|
||||
If the laugh needs a target, the target is the couple's shared circumstance — the fridge, the
|
||||
algorithm, the weather, the errand that ate the afternoon. Never either person's body, habits,
|
||||
competence, or effort.
|
||||
|
||||
## The snort test
|
||||
|
||||
The best daily lines make one partner snort and show the other the phone. Aim for roughly one in four
|
||||
questions to genuinely hit that bar. The rest should land warm and concrete. A pack where every line
|
||||
strains to be funny is as exhausting as a pack with no jokes at all.
|
||||
|
||||
## Example lists are categories, not vocabulary
|
||||
|
||||
The example lists in these guides (snacks, tiny dates, silly bets...) name *kinds* of content. They
|
||||
are not words to reuse. Do not put the guides' own example nouns — "two-song kitchen dance",
|
||||
"dessert walk", "snack board", "fake award" as literal text — into shipped questions. Invent your
|
||||
own specifics of the same kind.
|
||||
|
||||
If a guide example appears verbatim in a pack, that question is a reject.
|
||||
|
||||
## No template blocks
|
||||
|
||||
Within any 10 consecutive questions:
|
||||
|
||||
- no repeated game mechanic
|
||||
- no two prompts opening with the same first three words
|
||||
- no option set where all options share one grammatical template
|
||||
(four options all shaped "A + adjective + noun" is a machine fingerprint)
|
||||
|
||||
## Distribution should look human
|
||||
|
||||
A human writer favors some mechanics and neglects others. Exactly N of each mechanic, evenly spaced,
|
||||
is a machine fingerprint and a reject signal at review. Uneven is correct.
|
||||
|
||||
## The texting test
|
||||
|
||||
Read the question as a 6pm text to your partner. If it reads like a brand's Instagram caption or an
|
||||
app talking, rewrite it. A person wrote this for one specific other person — it should sound that way.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 9. Tone Rules by Pack Type
|
||||
|
||||
## Fun packs
|
||||
|
|
@ -1582,9 +1707,11 @@ ECHO Would make a normal couple roll their eyes.
|
|||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 18. Claude Instructions for Rewriting JSON Packs
|
||||
# 18. Agent Instructions for Rewriting JSON Packs
|
||||
|
||||
When Claude rewrites a pack:
|
||||
These rules bind every agent that rewrites a pack (ChatGPT, Claude, or any other writer).
|
||||
|
||||
When an agent rewrites a pack:
|
||||
|
||||
```bat
|
||||
ECHO Read the existing JSON first.
|
||||
|
|
@ -1607,7 +1734,7 @@ ECHO Report old count, new count, and net catalog change.
|
|||
ECHO Report any schema changes.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Claude should not say a file is done unless:
|
||||
The agent should not say a file is done unless:
|
||||
|
||||
```bat
|
||||
ECHO The JSON parses.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
# Closer Question Quality Checklist v10 — Importer-Aligned
|
||||
# Closer Question Quality Checklist v11 — Importer-Aligned, Human-Voice
|
||||
|
||||
**See also:** [QUESTION_CONTENT_GUIDE.md](QUESTION_CONTENT_GUIDE.md) | [QUESTION_SCHEMA.md](QUESTION_SCHEMA.md) | [QUESTION_REWRITE_PLAN.md](QUESTION_REWRITE_PLAN.md)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -31,6 +31,18 @@ Reject any question that contains or strongly resembles:
|
|||
|
||||
These are therapy worksheet patterns.
|
||||
|
||||
Also reject any question where (see `QUESTION_CONTENT_GUIDE.md` section 8A):
|
||||
|
||||
* an AI-tell phrase appears (`spice things up`, `level up`, `unleash`, `elevate`, `epic`, `ultimate`,
|
||||
`game-changer`, `adventure awaits`, `whimsical`, `a dash of`, `sprinkle`, and the rest of the 8A list)
|
||||
* "silly", "hilarious", "ridiculous", or "funny" is doing the humor work instead of a specific detail
|
||||
* a prompt contains an exclamation mark, or a prompt/option contains emoji
|
||||
* options are in Title Case
|
||||
* all options in one set share a single grammatical template
|
||||
* a guide example noun ("two-song kitchen dance", "dessert walk", "snack board") ships verbatim
|
||||
|
||||
These are machine-voice patterns.
|
||||
|
||||
## Production File Hard Checks
|
||||
|
||||
Run these before tone or content review.
|
||||
|
|
@ -382,6 +394,7 @@ Reject or rewrite if:
|
|||
* the same situation repeats with different nouns
|
||||
* the same answer pattern repeats
|
||||
* the weekday starts to feel like wallpaper
|
||||
* mechanic counts are implausibly even (exactly N of each mechanic is a machine fingerprint, not balance)
|
||||
|
||||
The pack can pass duplicate checks and still fail repetition review.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -433,6 +446,11 @@ Use these reasons when marking weak questions:
|
|||
* duplicate_text
|
||||
* duplicate_options
|
||||
* schema_issue
|
||||
* ai_voice
|
||||
* labeled_joke
|
||||
* uniform_option_grammar
|
||||
* guide_example_parrot
|
||||
* brand_caption_voice
|
||||
|
||||
## Final Verdict Labels
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue